Concerns Raised Over White House Review of Smithsonian Museum Exhibits

A growing number of historians and advocates for free expression have voiced strong concerns following the White House's announcement of an extensive review of exhibits displayed across Smithsonian museums and galleries.

The organization PEN America expressed apprehension that the review could lead to the distortion of historical facts and the removal of truthful content from museum exhibitions. Similarly, Sarah Weicksel, executive director of the American Historical Association, condemned the move as an excessive intervention.

Leading the nation’s largest association of professional historians, Weicksel reported hearing from many of the group's over 10,000 members who share serious reservations about the review.

She emphasized that only trained historians and museum professionals possess the expertise necessary to evaluate historical content accurately. Suggesting otherwise undermines the credibility and professional standards of curators, educators, and historians dedicated to producing well-researched, evidence-based exhibits.

The White House’s plan challenges the Smithsonian’s traditional independence, as the institution has long operated outside executive branch control. Governance is maintained by a bipartisan 17-member Board of Regents, with oversight by Congress.

Earlier this year, after the director of the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery was dismissed, the institution reaffirmed its authority over personnel decisions. However, the Board of Regents agreed to initiate an internal review to assess exhibits for potential bias or partisanship. This ongoing review followed the resignation of museum director Kim Sajet.