Decoding Trump’s Approach to Foreign Policy

Decoding Trump’s Approach to Foreign Policy

This article is adapted from a recent episode of a popular political podcast. Listeners can find the full discussion on major audio platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, YouTube, and iHeartRadio.

Coverage of conflicts in Israel and Gaza, as well as Ukraine and Russia, has diminished compared to previous years. This shift stems from two main factors.

Firstly, President Trump’s second term has been dominated by intense domestic political challenges, which have commanded much of the media’s attention. Secondly, when these international conflicts are reported on, the focus often centers on the United States’ stance and how it leverages its power, resources, and influence to resolve or manage these crises.

At the outset of his second term, President Trump appeared disengaged from the Gaza conflict beyond commercial interests such as hotel development. He also seemed willing to allow Israel to annex territories with little opposition. Regarding Ukraine, his position was marked by tension with President Volodymyr Zelensky and a notable emphasis on his relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

However, there have been subtle shifts in his 'America First' foreign policy approach, bringing more clarity to his administration’s international objectives. This raises questions about the nature of Trump’s foreign policy today, its progression during his current term, and its potential effectiveness.

To explore these developments, Emma Ashford, a senior fellow at the Stimson Center and an upcoming author of 'First Among Equals,' offers expert analysis. Known for her realist perspective, Ashford provides a nuanced understanding of the motivations behind Trump’s foreign policy, even if she does not always endorse its execution. Her insights help to objectively assess the administration’s foreign policy direction and its prospects.