Tuesday, August 5, 2025
Log In
Menu

Log In

Columbia and Brown Universities to Release Admissions and Racial Data Under Federal Settlement

As part of recent settlements, Columbia and Brown Universities will provide detailed admissions data, including race information, potentially reshaping elite college admissions practices.

Daniel Schwartz
Published • 3 MIN READ
Columbia and Brown Universities to Release Admissions and Racial Data Under Federal Settlement
As part of federal settlements, Columbia and Brown Universities have agreed to disclose comprehensive admissions data, including racial demographics.

Following recent settlements with two Ivy League institutions, the federal government will obtain access to standardized test scores and grade point averages for all applicants, along with their racial identities. This unprecedented level of data disclosure could significantly impact competitive college admissions.

This provision in the agreements with Columbia and Brown extends far beyond the usual information universities share with authorities. It was largely overshadowed by headlines about the universities agreeing to pay substantial sums to resolve allegations of federal anti-discrimination violations, including accusations relating to antisemitism.

Conservative groups have long sought such data to investigate whether colleges are circumventing the 2023 Supreme Court ruling that prohibits considering race in admissions decisions. It is expected that similar data demands will be made to other institutions in the future.

Meanwhile, college administrators and advocates who support holistic admissions processes worry that the released data could be used by government agencies, private entities, or individuals to bring new discrimination claims against universities, potentially putting federal funding at risk.

The administration is intensifying efforts to steer top-tier college admissions toward what it defines as 'merit-based' criteria, emphasizing grades and test scores. It argues that more subjective measures—such as evaluating applicants’ personal hardships or geographic background—may serve as covert proxies for race.

This heightened scrutiny is expected to influence admissions strategies nationwide, possibly prompting some universities to rethink recruitment initiatives targeting predominantly minority high schools or to reevaluate their acceptance of students with exceptional talents but lower test scores, even when such practices are believed to be lawful.

Daniel Schwartz
Daniel Schwartz

Daniel provides policy analysis, scrutinizing legislative impacts and governmental reforms across various sectors.

0 Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!